2016 – The Year Newfoundland Separatism Died

When you talk of separatism in Canada, most Canadians think of Quebec, but there has always been a smaller, but no less passionate, separatism sentiment in Newfoundland. (I am excluding Labrador on purpose; when someone in Labrador talks about separation, they talk about separating from Newfoundland, not from Canada). For the first fifty years or so after confederation when we were perennially the poorest and least respected province in the country, there was always a group who would argue that if we are going to be poor, we might as well be poor on our own than controlled by Canada. After the cod fishery collapsed, separatist sentiment spiked as people blamed Ottawa for mismanagement of the cod stocks, even though the federal government stepped in with a rather generous compensation program during the moratorium.

When oil and oil revenues surged a decade ago and have not finally did become no more, with the province becoming a contributor rather than a recipient of equalization, there were many who started to think that separation from Canada might be a viable. A very public battle with two successive prime ministers that lead to Danny Williams taking down the Canadian flag at the confederation building served to further inflame the small but growing separatist sentiment. Though there was no organized separatist organization, you could not sit at a bar anywhere on the island for any amount of time before you would hear people talking about how we would be better off if we were our own country. Then came 2016.

If you sit at a bar these days, you won’t hear anyone complaining about Ottawa. You will hear people arguing of whether Dwight Ball, Kathy Dunderdale, or Danny Williams is responsible for the mess we find ourselves in, but nationalists and federalists alike agree that we have made the bed we are currently lying in. You would have to spend a lot of time at a lot of bars before you’d come across someone arguing that we would be better off with Prime Minister Ball instead of Premier Ball.

Newfoundland separatism was always based more on emotion than logic. The fact is there is strength in numbers. Being part of a large, diverse country means lowers the risk of being obliterated by a downturn in a particular industry. The next time you complain about the hit that the Canadian dollar has taken in the past year, take a moment to think how the Newfoundland dollar would have fared during that same timeframe.

2016 has been a rough year; taxes are up, the economy is struggling, and a lot of people are worried about losing their jobs, but if there is a silver lining is that the threat of a viable separatist movement developing in this province has been extinguished forever. If we were to hold a referendum this summer, Commission of Government would get more votes than Responsible Government.

2 comments

  1. “Newfoundland separatism was always based more on emotion than logic.” Provide some real evidence.
    “The next time you complain about the hit that the Canadian dollar has taken in the past year, take a moment to think how the Newfoundland dollar would have fared during that same timeframe.” Is Iceland still there?
    This article simply states we are unable to do something different. The article is another byte from the Canadian wolf.

    1. All nationalist movements in first world countries are based primarily on emotions such as pride in one’s place and resentment towards the central government. The core people who get separatist movements going aren’t motivated by spreadsheets, which is why they generally remain that way all their life no matter how much circumstances change. Same goes for separatists in Quebec, Scotland, Labrador, Catalonia, etc. The die hard separatists will always blame the central government for all of the negative things and never see the positives. I’ve lived in Labrador, the UK, and Spain, and I’ve always been struck at how the separatists sound the same as those in Newfoundland, just with different accents/languages. The most eye opening was hearing people in Labrador talk about St. John’s the way we talk about Ottawa. Yes, Iceland is still there, and they still have never had an economy built on an oil boom. Newfoundland is far more dependent on oil revenues than Canada at large and the Canadian dollar still took a hit, so there is no question that a Newfoundland dollar would have been decimated. You could argue that a weakened Newfoundland dollar might help with exports, but it would unquestionably have bit hit much harder than the Loonie. Thanks for your comment. I appreciate the feedback.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *